Re: [wg-review] [process] Bounced Messages and language issues

[Kent Crispin <kent@songbird.com>]

On Thu, Jan 18, 2001 at 05:53:11PM +0000, Pilar Luque wrote:
> Kent,
> 
> I said I would try my best as I am very interested in getting this
> motion forward. Try to be a bit more understanding.
                  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

That was precisely my point.  It is in fact the case that ICANN has
known from the beginning that translations are important, *everyone* in
ICANN is profoundly aware of this issue, *everyone* is trying their best
to get there.  In other words, this is a non-issue; the battle has been
won; there are only the practical difficulties in the way.  But the
practical difficulties are significant, and ICANN is heavily constrained
by resources, so, to quote you:

    "Try to be a bit more understanding."

>  I am actually
> working on the translation of a lenthy document into English!!!   I even
> initiated this discussion.  What is the exact limit date for completing
> the DNSO Review report?

It was 3 days ago, on January 15.  The current activities are in an
unofficial weird limbo state, and have no meaningful cutoff date before
the Melbourne meeting -- a report could be submitted any time as part of
the general public comment period. 

-- 
Kent Crispin                               "Be good, and you will be
kent@songbird.com                           lonesome." -- Mark Twain
--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html