Re: DNSGA Re: [wg-review] [Review] ccTLD vs DNSO vs ICANN vs GAC

[Eric Dierker <ERIC@HI-TEK.COM>]

I think this is a correct assessment.  But I add: and continue to participate in
ICANN.

Derek Conant wrote:

> Domain Name System General Assembly (DNSGA)
> http://www.dnsga.org
>
> Maybe the international Internet community, and more specifically ccTLD
> representatives, need to participate in a new organization wholly separate from
> ICANN?
>
> Eric Dierker wrote:
>
> > I bow to your wisdom and Greg's analysis of how we can accomplish the most good.
> >
> > Sincerely,
> >
> > Joanna Lane wrote:
> >
> > > Eric wrote:-
> > > Don't you think that perhaps our input may help them in the task.  The
> > > extraordinary support from this group regarding addressing the issues of
> > > multi-lingualism should at least let them know they have a wide base of
> > > support
> > > to come up with solutions.  Also it will give people a heads up as to what
> > > likely antagonists positioning will be, something I would be most grateful
> > > for.
> > >
> > > On the other hand I would like to know where in Mr. Burton's categories this
> > > thread belongs.
> > >
> > > [Joanna]  I just think we could save time if we knew what the ccTLD's want
> > > first, and in particular, from this WG.
> > > Hello ccTLDs, do you have any position papers to clarify the issues for us?
> > >
> > > > YJ Park wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hello members,
> > > > >
> > > > > As you read, Bill asked not to cross post wg-review message to
> > > > > cctld-discuss list. Please keep this in mind.
> > > > >
> > > > > We have focused "Language Divide" and "Translation Cost" in
> > > > > ICANN process. As you may know, ccTLD is going to have a
> > > > > meeting in Hawaii to figure out what their future should be.
> > > > >
> > > > > Since ccTLD constituency is in the DNSO structure at this juncture,
> > > > > it might be more productive to discuss bigger picture for WG-Review's
> > > > > recommendation to the Names Council.
> > > > >
> > > > > 1. [DNSO Structure Discussion] ccTLD should be in the DNSO?
> > > > > 2. If not, what could be the potential model
> > > > > 3. [NET Sovereignty] If so, what kind of relations should there
> > > > >     be between ccTLD and ICANN
> > > > > 4. What kind of relations among ccTLD vs ICANN vs GAC
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > > :So with this in mind just what sort of relations exist at this time?
> > > >
> > > > I am not comfortable with discussing what would be the appropriate model
> > > for
> > > > ccTLDs, when they, themselves, have not yet determined what their future
> > > > should be. I would have thought we should wait for a proposal to come from
> > > > Hawaii, then discuss the merits.
> > > > Joanna
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
> > > > Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> > > > ("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
> > > > Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> > >
> > > --
> > > This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
> > > Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> > > ("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
> > > Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
begin:vcard 
n:Dierker;Eric
tel;fax:(858) 571-8497
tel;work:(858) 571-8431
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
adr:;;;;;;
version:2.1
email;internet:Eric@Hi-Tek.com
end:vcard