RE: [wg-review] [Review] ccTLD vs DNSO vs ICANN vs GAC

["Joanna Lane" <jo-uk@rcn.com>]

Eric wrote:-
Don't you think that perhaps our input may help them in the task.  The
extraordinary support from this group regarding addressing the issues of
multi-lingualism should at least let them know they have a wide base of
support
to come up with solutions.  Also it will give people a heads up as to what
likely antagonists positioning will be, something I would be most grateful
for.

On the other hand I would like to know where in Mr. Burton's categories this
thread belongs.

[Joanna]  I just think we could save time if we knew what the ccTLD's want
first, and in particular, from this WG.
Hello ccTLDs, do you have any position papers to clarify the issues for us?


> YJ Park wrote:
>
> > Hello members,
> >
> > As you read, Bill asked not to cross post wg-review message to
> > cctld-discuss list. Please keep this in mind.
> >
> > We have focused "Language Divide" and "Translation Cost" in
> > ICANN process. As you may know, ccTLD is going to have a
> > meeting in Hawaii to figure out what their future should be.
> >
> > Since ccTLD constituency is in the DNSO structure at this juncture,
> > it might be more productive to discuss bigger picture for WG-Review's
> > recommendation to the Names Council.
> >
> > 1. [DNSO Structure Discussion] ccTLD should be in the DNSO?
> > 2. If not, what could be the potential model
> > 3. [NET Sovereignty] If so, what kind of relations should there
> >     be between ccTLD and ICANN
> > 4. What kind of relations among ccTLD vs ICANN vs GAC
> >
>
> > :So with this in mind just what sort of relations exist at this time?
>
> I am not comfortable with discussing what would be the appropriate model
for
> ccTLDs, when they, themselves, have not yet determined what their future
> should be. I would have thought we should wait for a proposal to come from
> Hawaii, then discuss the merits.
> Joanna
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html