[wg-review] [Agenda] Fitting language/translation in & schedule

[Greg Burton <sidna@feedwriter.com>]

At 03:59 PM 1/17/01, Eric Dierker wrote:
>On the other hand I would like to know where in Mr. Burton's categories this
>thread belongs.

Half procedures and half constituencies, I'd say :

[DNSO Structure Discussion] ccTLD should be in the DNSO?
If not, what could be the potential model?

I think these would legitimately fall in the constituencies discussion, and 
would hope that we have a lot of input from ccTLD folks. The other two are 
probably beyond the scope of this group before February 20th.

The language issue is VERY important to a great many people, and needs to 
be discussed further. Currently the list is

>1. Preliminary Report Discussion and Approval
>2. Constituencies
>3. General Assembly
>4. Names Council
>5. Work Groups
>6. Standardized Procedures and Language/Translation Issues
>7. Outreach

Comments so far:
 From Bret:
I also suggest that, where a contention is made, or, something is
proposed, brief justification and background, should be included.



Regards,
Greg

sidna@feedwriter.com

--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html