Re: [wg-review] 11. IDNH creation and constituencies' debate

[Bret Busby <bret@clearsol.iinet.net.au>]

Luca Muscarà wrote:
> 


> Dear members,
> 
> after three weeks, it seems to me that this WG is often caught in between two
> opposing ways of thinking: one that consists of an epistemological reflection
> on the adequacy, fairness and democracy of current processes and procedures;
> and another--more pragmatical and practical--that tries to find the best
> solution not in absolute terms, but relative to the given timeframes and
> contexts. Beside taking a lot of time and creating difficulties in managing
> this WG for the Chairs, this dialectic should be considered IMHO one of the
> main reasons of interest of this WG and should be to some extent preserved,
> without harming of course the functioning of the whole process.
> 
> Regards to all,
> 
> Luca Muscarà
> 

What?

Translation please, in plain english.

-- 

Bret Busby

Armadale, West Australia

......................................
"So once you do know what the question actually is, you'll know what the
answer means."
 - Deep Thought, Chapter 28 of The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy
 - Douglas Adams, 1988 
......................................
--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html