[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [wg-c] Tuesday's NC meeting

To: wg-c@dnso.org
Subject: Re: [wg-c] Tuesday's NC meeting
From: Raul Echeberria <raul@inia.org.uy>
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2000 00:51:14 -0300
In-Reply-To: <4.2.2.20000421130224.00a847e0@pop4.ibm.net>
References: <3.0.3.32.20000420235714.02f82e68@msen.com>
Sender: owner-wg-c@dnso.org

At 19:28 21/04/00 -0500, dwmaher@ibm.net wrote:
>Jon:
>         I concur in your proposal to disband WG-C for the reasons you 
>mentioned.
>         You have earned our gratitude and respect for undertaking an 
>extremely difficult job and doing it very professionally and very well. If 
>all the participants had exhibited the patience and restraint that you 
>showed, the consensus certainly would have been much stronger and might 
>even have been sufficiently strong to convince NC.
>                         David Maher


I sign it.




Raul Echeberria
raul@inia.org.uy

References:
- [wg-c] Tuesday's NC meeting
  - From: Jonathan Weinberg <weinberg@mail.msen.com>
- Re: [wg-c] Tuesday's NC meeting
  - From: dwmaher@ibm.net

Prev by Date: [wg-c] disbanding
Next by Date: [wg-c] Sunday Reflections
Prev by thread: Re: [wg-c] Tuesday's NC meeting
Next by thread: [wg-c] NSI's "survey" shows most don't want 6 to 10 new TLDs
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread