[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [wg-c] CONSENSUS CALLS -- THIS IS IT

To: "Christopher Ambler" <cambler@iodesign.com>, <wg-c@dnso.org>, "Jonathan Weinberg" <weinberg@mail.msen.com>
Subject: Re: [wg-c] CONSENSUS CALLS -- THIS IS IT
From: Harald Tveit Alvestrand <Harald@Alvestrand.no>
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2000 07:58:44 +0200
In-Reply-To: <00c301bfa3f7$de6f02d0$4a0e379d@redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
References: <3.0.3.32.20000411112918.02f92368@msen.com><3.0.3.32.20000411164728.00708a20@msen.com>
Sender: owner-wg-c@dnso.org

At 13:52 11.04.2000 -0700, Christopher Ambler wrote:
>You are proposing a WG on a *policy* matter.
>
>ICANN's very own mandate says that they oversee TECHNICAL
>COORDINATION of the Internet.
>
>How do you justify this?
Technical coordination has to have policies too.

                Harald

--
Harald Tveit Alvestrand, EDB Maxware, Norway
Harald.Alvestrand@edb.maxware.no

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [wg-c] CONSENSUS CALLS -- THIS IS IT
  - From: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@brandenburg.com>

References:
- [wg-c] CONSENSUS CALLS -- THIS IS IT
  - From: Jonathan Weinberg <weinberg@mail.msen.com>
- Re: [wg-c] CONSENSUS CALLS -- THIS IS IT
  - From: Jonathan Weinberg <weinberg@mail.msen.com>
- Re: [wg-c] CONSENSUS CALLS -- THIS IS IT
  - From: "Christopher Ambler" <cambler@iodesign.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [wg-c] CONSENSUS CALLS -- THIS IS IT
Next by Date: Re: [wg-c] CONSENSUS CALLS -- THIS IS IT
Prev by thread: Re: [wg-c] CONSENSUS CALLS -- THIS IS IT
Next by thread: Re: [wg-c] CONSENSUS CALLS -- THIS IS IT
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread