[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [wg-c] Proposed gTLDs: The IAHC Seven



Really? Then why do they say on their web sites that they'll be
entered into the CORE system in a round-robin fashion? Why
do they still maintain, on some sites, that CORE will have the
7 names in the root soon (some say as soon as September of
1999 (sic)).

For that matter, what happened to the CORE SRS? Was the
system scrapped in favour of the one CORE is running now
to be an ICANN registrar? Was all of the data from the
test that CORE ran just dumped?

Finally, Dave, what is your authority here with respect to
CORE? How do you know this?

I look forward to your answers.

--
Christopher Ambler
chris@the.web

----- Original Message -----
From: "Dave Crocker" <dcrocker@brandenburg.com>
To: "Mark C. Langston" <mark@bitshift.org>
Cc: <wg-c@dnso.org>
Sent: Monday, April 10, 2000 10:46 AM
Subject: Re: [wg-c] Proposed gTLDs: The IAHC Seven


> At 10:07 AM 4/10/00 -0700, Mark C. Langston wrote:
> >On Mon, Apr 10, 2000 at 09:28:16AM -0700, Dave Crocker wrote:
> > > Rather than observing the tautology that this community is constantly
> > > changing, do you know of specific problems with that list of seven
> > > names?  (Other than the frequently cited claim(s) about .web.)
> >
> >I can think of one:  Weren't the CORE registrars pre-selling
registrations
> >in the IAHC 7 up until last year?  What is the current status of those
>
> Some CORE registrars chose to put customers into their own, private
queues.
>
> That activity was ENTIRELY INDEPENDENT OF CORE, itself, and those queues
> HAVE NO STATUS OR POSITION, other than with those individual CORE
registrars.
>
> Next question?
>
> d/
>
> =-=-=-=-=
> Dave Crocker  <dcrocker@brandenburg.com>
> Brandenburg Consulting  <www.brandenburg.com>
> Tel: +1.408.246.8253,  Fax: +1.408.273.6464
> 675 Spruce Drive,  Sunnyvale, CA 94086 USA