[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [wg-c] voting on TLDs

To: "Mark C. Langston" <skritch@home.com>
Subject: Re: [wg-c] voting on TLDs
From: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@brandenburg.com>
Date: Sun, 05 Mar 2000 22:25:11 -0800
Cc: wg-c <wg-c@dnso.org>
In-Reply-To: <20000305213957.B363@home.com>
References: <4.3.0.20000305161218.00bf3330@mail.bayarea.net><20000305141438.A23254@songbird.com><Pine.WNT.4.21.0003051513170.-374817@prime-radiant.cavebear .com><4.3.0.20000305161218.00bf3330@mail.bayarea.net>
Sender: owner-wg-c@dnso.org

At 09:39 PM 3/5/2000 -0800, Mark C. Langston wrote:

>That's odd.  Until someone went and got Paul Vixie to state that
>adding a large number of new TLDs would pose no technical problem, the
>arguments here were about instability rooted in technical issues.
>Now that that argument is untenable, it's shifted to the unprovable
>claim that adding new registries will break things.

Your assessment of history is thoroughly inaccurate.

d/

=-=-=-=-=
Dave Crocker  <dcrocker@brandenburg.com>
Brandenburg Consulting  <www.brandenburg.com>
Tel: +1.408.246.8253,  Fax: +1.408.273.6464
675 Spruce Drive,  Sunnyvale, CA 94086 USA

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [wg-c] voting on TLDs
  - From: "Christopher Ambler" <cambler@iodesign.com>

References:
- Re: [wg-c] voting on TLDs
  - From: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@brandenburg.com>
- Re: [wg-c] voting on TLDs
  - From: Kent Crispin <kent@songbird.com>
- Re: [wg-c] voting on TLDs
  - From: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@brandenburg.com>
- Re: [wg-c] voting on TLDs
  - From: "Mark C. Langston" <skritch@home.com>

Prev by Date: [wg-c] vote?
Next by Date: Re: [wg-c] voting on TLDs
Prev by thread: Re: [wg-c] voting on TLDs
Next by thread: Re: [wg-c] voting on TLDs
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread