[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [wg-b] Points of agreement
At 10:07 15.12.99 -0500, Hartman, Steve wrote:
>I regret I cannot agree with the first. Reasonable criteria can be
>formulated for defining a famous mark for the limited purpose of an
>exclusionary rule. The second is probably right; it would depend in large
>part on how many marks are deemed famous. I agree with the third.
If you say "can be formulated", I think we're still in agreement (I *so*
much want to have agreement on something....) because my statement was
> - Famous marks are not defined to the point where one can make a list of
We can disagree on whether it's possible to make a reasonable list based on
reasonable criteria in the future without disagreeing about whether they
exist now or not.
I know, I'm clutching at straws.....
Harald Tveit Alvestrand, EDB Maxware, Norway