[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [wg-b] Re: Nature of answer to question B
Then we can assume that neither you nor Mr. Alverstrand will vote for
Option C, and that you are both in favor of a decently run UDRP.
At 05:07 PM 10/22/99 -0400, you wrote:
>Martin B. Schwimmer wrote:
>> Harald Alverstrand wrote:
>> >- UDRP will significantly reduce the cost to the "famous mark" holders of
>> > protecting their marks against clear cases of cyberpiracy compared to
>> > the curent situation
>> Is your goal to increase the cost?
>No, Harald is simply pointing out that most of the work that needs to be
>accomplished already by a UDRP. Harald's view about the UDRP was supported
>opinion of a well-known trademark lawyer. On September 3, that trademark
>"My problem with the exclusion is that it seems to provide little marginal
>over a decently-run UDRP."
>The name of that trademark lawyer? Martin Schwimmer.
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @