[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [wg-b] RE: Arbitration (RE: (wg-b) food for thought)

To: "DEUTSCH, SARAH B." <SARAH.B.DEUTSCH@bellatlantic.com>
Subject: Re: [wg-b] RE: Arbitration (RE: (wg-b) food for thought)
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 1999 17:28:52 -0700
Cc: wg-b@dnso.org
References: <199909231957.PAA08378@imr01.bellatlantic.com>
Sender: owner-wg-b@dnso.org

> I thought we were supposed to working on protecting famous marks in this
> working group.

i think we're also attempting to decide if they, for some definition, be
protected.

randy

References:
- [wg-b] RE: Arbitration (RE: (wg-b) food for thought)
  - From: "DEUTSCH, SARAH B." <SARAH.B.DEUTSCH@bellatlantic.com>

Prev by Date: [wg-b] Re: Arbitration (RE: (wg-b) food for thought)
Next by Date: RE: [wg-b] food for thought
Prev by thread: [wg-b] Re: Arbitration (RE: (wg-b) food for thought)
Next by thread: [wg-b] What WG-B is supposed to be doing (RE: Arbitration)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread