[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [wg-b] Preliminary Questions

To: d3nnis <d3nnis@mciworld.com>
Subject: Re: [wg-b] Preliminary Questions
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Sep 1999 17:02:16 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: "Cade,Marilyn S - LGA" <mcade@att.com>, Harald Tveit Alvestrand <Harald@alvestrand.no>, "Martin B. Schwimmer" <martys@interport.net>, wg-b@dnso.org
References: <6751E347E374D211857100A0C92563DC6376C2@MAILDC><MAPI.Id.0016.00303969726238313030304330303043@MAPI.to.RFC822>
Sender: owner-wg-b@dnso.org

> The only future mitigating factor I see is that IP v6 is supposed to
> permit the same name to be used by different registrants in different
> registries.

uh, this is not ringing a bell in my head with what little i understand
about ipv6.  i am not aware that ipv6 does anything to domain names.

randy

References:
- RE: [wg-b] Preliminary Questions
  - From: "Cade,Marilyn S - LGA" <mcade@att.com>
- [wg-b] Response to Jonathan's Question
  - From: d3nnis <d3nnis@mciworld.com>

Prev by Date: Re: The Fame Claim List -was [wg-b] notification as compromise?
Next by Date: RE: Notification (RE: [wg-b] Preliminary Questions)
Prev by thread: RE: The Fame Claim List -was [wg-b] notification as compromise?
Next by thread: Re: Notification (RE: [wg-b] Preliminary Questions)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread