[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [registrars] Code of Conduct

To: "Registrars@Dnso.Org" <registrars@dnso.org>
Subject: Re: [registrars] Code of Conduct
From: "Robert F. Connelly" <rconnell@psi-japan.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2000 06:20:35 +0900
In-Reply-To: <38E240C8.B576E639@REACTO.com>
References: <007a01bf9846$88527060$45fda8c0@MIKE.infonetworks.com><4.3.1.2.20000328184245.00c82d80@teal.sni.net><022701bf995c$b73ccf80$0901a8c0@lodgerelgx0ljx>
Sender: owner-registrars@dnso.org

At 18:43 29-03-2000 +0100, Paul M. Kane wrote:
>I believe it is more important for us rather than ICANN to propose/introduce
>best practice, using our experience to drive quality of service(s)...

Dear Paul:  IMO, we can take the lead to propose it, but if we attempt to 
implement it, we become a trade group attempting to control our members and 
take the risk of coming under anti-trust litigation.  Much better for ICANN 
to assume that role.

Regards, BobC, who removes redundant recipients, such as Francois and Paul.

References:
- RE: [registrars] Code of Conduct
  - From: "Michael D. Palage" <mpalage@infonetworks.com>
- RE: [registrars] Code of Conduct
  - From: "Robert F. Connelly" <rconnell@psi-japan.com>
- Re: [registrars] Code of Conduct
  - From: "Collignon Francois" <collignon@7ways.net>
- Re: [registrars] Code of Conduct
  - From: "Paul M. Kane" <Paul.Kane@reacto.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [registrars] Code of Conduct
Next by Date: RE: [registrars] Code of Conduct
Prev by thread: Re: [registrars] Code of Conduct
Next by thread: Re: [registrars] Code of Conduct
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread