[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [registrars] Ballot - remember to vote
At 06:46 10-02-2000 -0800, Josh Elliott wrote:
>The real issue you have brought up is a good one. Efforts to adhere to the
>ICANN global diversity requirement seemed to be more based on ethinc
>diversity than regional diversity. I don't know what the solution is, but
>complaining about the GAC and its influence on ICANN surely isn't it. That
>argument is going nowhere fast.
Thanks for your reply. I feel like I am crying in the wilderness. But
until I can energize like minded souls, I see nothing I can do but keep the
issue before the eyes of the Constituencies. Unfortunately, I have access
only to the Registrars Constituency.
At the Berlin meeting, we came away with the IP Constituency permitted to
have three NC delegates from North America. The Registrars Constituency,
though told by Louis that the regional diversity issue was not mandatory,
insisted on maintaining it. We duly elected residents of three
regions. After that, the "citizenship" issue raised its ugly head.
I think I should post my first analysis again, with the added insight of
the existence of citizenship having connections to multiple ICANN regions
(Brits in British Indian Ocean Territory, French in possessions along East
Coast or North America and off Africa).
I think it should be obvious that *residency* in the region is far more
significant than citizenship in the region. Would we select a Japanese or
Australian or Indonesian or etc. living in North America as an NC delegate
for the AP region? Certainly not. In my mind, the GAC raised the
citizenship issue out of an inherent xenophobic mind set of governmental
operatives. How many national governments do you know which employ
resident alien staff and support employees -- even to pick up
garbage. Certainly some do. However, in Japan, Korean nationals who have
been born in Japan for three generations have difficulty getting such a
job. I could go on and on. In fact, I have;-}
Please help me fine tune this appeal.
Personal regards, BobC