[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [registrars] ICANN Funding
I will communicate to the TFF that there is still broad support for the
proportional (variable) fee.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: email@example.com [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]On
> Behalf Of Amadeu Abril i Abril
> Sent: Saturday, September 25, 1999 7:06 PM
> To: email@example.com
> Cc: firstname.lastname@example.org
> Subject: Re: [registrars] ICANN Funding
> Richard Forman wrote:
> > Many of you have asked questions about the $1.00 per name ICANN
> fee that was
> > originally proposed and subsequently withdrawn by ICANN. Prior
> to July 1999
> > there was broad consensus on some type of proportional fee.
> However, the
> > TFF is interested in exploring sustainable and fair alternatives to the
> > $1.00 fee. I have provided a link to Esther Dyson's letter to
> > Representative Bliley and also cut and pasted the section from
> her letter
> > regarding the fee.
> Sure, *but please conver to the TFF that many registrars have also
> expressed storng support to that system, at least as an interim
> measure. And Per-Anders will provide very easily the list of all those
> that agreed to keep making such contriubtion, even in a voluntary
> basis (among them Nominalia).