[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [registrars] Registrar Constituency Teleconference - Minutes - 6-8-99

At 15:34 09-06-99 -0400, Michael D. Palage wrote:
>* Nominations/elections - The groups agreed by consensus that the nomination
>process would remain open until this Friday evening at which time I would
>prepare a ballot to circulate to all the authorized agents to vote.  Voting
>would take place next week.  There was a discussion on how the Names Council
>representatives would be elected as it is was agreed that candidates would
>be categorized into geographic regions and each representative would be
>allowed to cast one vote per geographic region.  There was an objection by
>the Melbourne IT representative that the representative be allowed to cast
>their votes for the best candidate regardless of geographical limitations.
>This is a moot point at the present time since we have nominations in only
>three geographic regions, and the group has expressed it intended to comply
>with the geographic diversity requirement.

Dear Michael:

That was my position as well.  If for some reason, a voting member wants to 
vote for several in one region, that should be his/her option.

'Ome is where my