ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[registrars]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [registrars] Re: VGRS RRP Connectivity loss



Connectivity apparently has been restored ..... Seems like it was some
sort of an issue with their upstream provider

Im wondering whether this comes under their SLA as an unscheduled
outage? 

bhavin

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-registrars@dnso.org 
> [mailto:owner-registrars@dnso.org] On Behalf Of Gary Boyd
> Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 2:20 PM
> To: registrars@dnso.org
> Subject: RE: [registrars] Re: VGRS RRP Connectivity loss
> 
> 
> They are testing a fix at the moment but no ETA on a release.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bhavin Turakhia [mailto:bhavin.t@directi.com]
> Sent: 27 June 2003 09:20
> To: registrars@dnso.org
> Subject: [registrars] Re: VGRS RRP Connectivity loss
> 
> 
> 
> we are not even getting intermittent connectivity :( - nevertheless i 
> believe vgrs is tackling the issue while we speak, so we 
> should soon hear 
> the reason and resolution :) 
> 
> bhavin 
> 
> > We are experiencing about 50% packet loss, and intermittent 
> > connectivity to the registry. The traceroute seems to 
> indicate heavy 
> > traffic at verisign end
> > 
> > Regards
> > Paul Fallon
> > Total Registrations
> > http://www.totalregistrations.com
> > 
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Marcelo Kreyness [mailto:tech@dotregistrar.com]
> >> Sent: 27 June 2003 08:14
> >> To: Bhavin Turakhia; registrars@dnso.org
> >> Subject: Re: [registrars] VGRS RRP Connectivity loss
> >> 
> >> 
> >> Bhavin,
> >> 
> >> Actually I can ping them, with a 76% of packet loss.
> >> I think TELNET maybe could work with such a loss, but SSL not. 
> >> Pinging trrp1.verisign-grs.com the packet loss is 0%.
> >> 
> >> Marcelo
> >> 
> >> ----- Original Message -----
> >> From: "Bhavin Turakhia" <bhavin.t@directi.com>
> >> To: "'Marcelo Kreyness'" <tech@dotregistrar.com>; 
> >> <registrars@dnso.org>
> >> Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 4:01 AM
> >> Subject: RE: [registrars] VGRS RRP Connectivity loss 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> Hi marcelo,
> >> 
> >> I have found that a traceroute as such never works. I 
> believe their 
> >> firewall prevents traceroute and ping packets. I can never 
> traceroute 
> >> to them even when my rrp is working. The test I normally use is
> >> a telnet to
> >> their port 648 on that server. 
> >> 
> >> In this situation right now however the weird thing is I 
> can telnet 
> >> to their port 648 but cannot perform any rrp transactions.
> >> 
> >> bhavin
> >> 
> >> > -----Original Message-----
> >> > From: Marcelo Kreyness [mailto:tech@dotregistrar.com]
> >> > Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 12:25 PM
> >> > To: Bhavin Turakhia; registrars@dnso.org
> >> > Subject: Re: [registrars] VGRS RRP Connectivity loss
> >> > 
> >> > 
> >> > Hi Bhavin,
> >> > 
> >> > Yes, there is a problem in the route to VGRS.
> >> > Try to traceroute rrp.verisign-grs.com and you'll see.
> >> > 
> >> > Best Regards,
> >> > 
> >> > Marcelo Kreyness
> >> > DotRegistrar.com
> >> > 
> >> > 
> >> > ----- Original Message -----
> >> > From: "Bhavin Turakhia" <bhavin.t@directi.com>
> >> > To: <registrars@dnso.org>
> >> > Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 3:37 AM
> >> > Subject: [registrars] VGRS RRP Connectivity loss
> >> > 
> >> > 
> >> > 
> >> > Hi,
> >> > 
> >> > We are facing rrp connectivity issues since last hour or
> >> > more. Are any other registrars having a problem conecting to 
> >> > vgrs live??
> >> > 
> >> > Best Regards
> >> > Bhavin Turakhia
> >> > Founder, CEO and Chairman
> >> > Directi
> >> > --------------------------------------
> >> > http://www.directi.com
> >> > Direct Line: +91 (22) 2879 7600
> >> > Direct Fax: +91 (22) 2879 7510
> >> > Board Line (USA): +1 (415) 240 4172
> >> > Board Line (India): +91 (22) 2879 7500
> >> > --------------------------------------
> >> > 
> >> >  
> >> 
>  
> 
> 
> This email has been scanned for viruses by NetBenefit using 
> Sophos anti-virus technology
> 
> 
> 
> This email has been scanned for viruses by NetBenefit using 
> Sophos anti-virus technology
> 
> 
> 



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>