RE: [registrars] Registrars code of conduct

["Elana Broitman" <ebroitman@register.com>]

That draft was adopted and stands as the voluntary code.  I'll dig the archives for the vote count

Why start from scracth when over a year was spent on this.

-----Original Message-----
From: ross@tucows.com 
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 9:54 AM
To: Elana Broitman
Cc: Paul Westley; Tim Ruiz; Bruce.Tonkin@melbourneit.com.au;
Registrars@dnso.org
Subject: Re: [registrars] Registrars code of conduct


On 6/16/2003 9:49 AM Elana Broitman noted that:

> We should begin by providing an overview of the code adopted previously as it took over a year to get us to that stage.  The discussion on this list has been about a voluntary code, which even in voluntary form seems not to be acceptable to a number of folks.  So, I think it's premature to get Dan Halloran involved and discuss how to make it binding under the RAA.  
> 
> I would support spending some agenda time on the voluntary code already developed.  As Bruce suggested this, he can decide what to do with the time.  I would recommend having one of the folks involved in the original drafting explain the current code for at least part of the time.
> 

Problem is, there is no current or previous code. There is a draft,but 
there was never, to the best of my recollection, a vote to adopt this as 
a documment of the constituency.

If we are goinng to re-start this effort, I'd rather not bumble around 
in the dark like we did last time. The best way to avoid this is to 
ensure that we understand the ground rules from the start. The only way 
to do this is to have someone explicitly tell us what those rules are.



                        -rwr




"There's a fine line between fishing and standing on the shore like an 
idiot."
- Steven Wright

Get Blog... http://www.byte.org/