[registrars] Re: Not so fast Rick!!!!! Hold off on the election

[Rick Wesson <wessorh@ar.com>]

Jim,

did Dr. Berryhill agree to stand before nominations close? Our bylaws to
state the use of Roberts Rules and in section 4.3.5 nomees are required to
post a acceptance by the close of nominations shich closed las friday,
furthremore you may consule section II of the rules of proceure.

Since we did not get an acceptance posed to the list before friday
I don't see how we can have an election for Secretary at this time.

I propose that we hold another nomination period for secretary after the
eletions of the seats we have, at that time you may nominate Dr Berryhill
for secretary.

-rick


On Mon, 2 Jun 2003, Jim Archer wrote:

> Rick, Dr. Berryhill has agreed to stand for election.  As you suggested in
> a private email to me last week, I carefully reviewed the bylaws posted on
> the RC site and saw no requirement in the bylaws that John actually accept
> the nomination.  His nomination for both Chair and Secretary is valid.
>
> Furthermore, if neither Elana nor Rob were nominated for Secretary then
> they can not be on the ballot.
>
> I insist that this election not begin until this issue is resolved!
>
> Jim
>
> --On Monday, June 02, 2003 8:05 AM -0700 Rick Wesson <wessorh@ar.com> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Registrars:
> >
> > The period for nominations have closed, the ballot will open on today.
> >
> > The current nominees are:
> >
> >   Chair:
> >     o Elana Broitman
> >     o Rob Hall
> >
> >   Secretary:
> >
> >
> >   Treasurer:
> >     o Paul Westley
> >
> >   CTO:
> >     o Rick Wesson
> >
> >
> > Since Mr Berryhill did not accept the nomination for Secretary I would
> > like to suggest that we have Elana and Rob run for Secretary also.
> >
> > remember each seat must get at least 51% of the vote to win.
> >
> >
> > -rick
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>