RE: [registrars] Deletes Implementation Committee?

["Ross Wm. Rader" <ross@tucows.com>]

> Wearing my hat as GNSO chair, it is on my list to do.

Thanks for the note Bruce - good to hear that someone has it on their
list. I was afraid that I had missed something or worse, that it had
been swept under someone's rug.

Thanks,

-rwr



> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-registrars@dnso.org 
> [mailto:owner-registrars@dnso.org] On Behalf Of Bruce Tonkin
> Sent: Monday, May 05, 2003 5:50 AM
> To: Ross Wm. Rader; registrars@dnso.org
> Subject: RE: [registrars] Deletes Implementation Committee?
> 
> 
> Hello Ross,
> 
> Wearing my hat as GNSO chair, it is on my list to do.
> 
> I have corresponded via email with the Deletes Task Force 
> chair, and had suggested we use a similar membership to the 
> Transfers or WHOIS implementation committee.
> 
> What I had planned to do, was create a first draft of an 
> implementation committee report and hold a teleconference 
> sending an invite to the members of the last implementation 
> committee.  I have just been a bit snowed under lately.
> 
> If any registrar would like to be involved in the 
> implementation discussion then please let me know.
> 
> Regards,
> Bruce Tonkin
> 
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Ross Wm. Rader [mailto:ross@tucows.com]
> > Sent: Sunday, 4 May 2003 12:30 AM
> > To: registrars@dnso.org
> > 
> > In the course of getting caught up with the comings and
> > goings of the GNSO Council, I came across the following 
> > snippet in the minutes of their April
> > 17 meeting. What is the current status of this effort? Who is 
> > representing registrar interests on this committee? How are 
> > they taking input? Are they going to meet their deadlines?
> > 
> > Thanks in advance to anyone that can shed light on this effort.
> > 
> > --
> > 
> > Discussion highlighted the value of an implementation group
> > being formed, composed of Registrars, Registries, task force 
> > members and ICANN Staff which would provide feedback to the 
> > task force. Taking into account the critical nature of 
> > deleting a domain name, the process should be correct and the 
> > possible timeframe considered for the report to be voted on 
> > by Council was the June 2003 meeting in Montreal.
> > Bruce Tonkin seconded by Ken Stubbs, proposed:
> > 
> > *         That the Chair of the GNSO Council would liaise 
> > with the Chair of
> > the Deletes Task Force for the creation of an implementation
> > group and the implementation group would provide input to the 
> > Deletes Task Force.
> > 
> > *         The Deletes task force would have 2 weeks to 
> > assimilate the input
> > received and present the revised Final Report to be voted on
> > by the Council.
> > 
> > Vote: Unanimous support of voting Council members
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
>