RE: [registrars] Credit card fraud and transfers

["Ross Wm. Rader" <ross@tucows.com>]

> However, what about returning a domain to the prior registrar 
> after an 
> accidental or improper transfer?

The document assumes that registrars are adults that can work problems
out between themselves. Failing that, there is a dispute resolution
mechanism that can force compliance and/or action. If satisfaction
cannot be had through this new additional process, then the last resort
is the judicial system.



                       -rwr




"There's a fine line between fishing and standing on the shore like an
idiot."
- Steven Wright

Get Blog... http://www.byte.org/


 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-registrars@dnso.org 
> [mailto:owner-registrars@dnso.org] On Behalf Of Robert F. Connelly
> Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2003 11:09 AM
> To: registrar Constituency
> Subject: RE: [registrars] Credit card fraud and transfers
> 
> 
> At 10:57 AM 3/20/03 -0500, Ross Wm. Rader wrote:
> >The new transfer policy that the board will be voting on next week 
> >includes a new 60-day "no transfer after transfer" window 
> (in addition 
> >to the old 60-day "no transfer after initial registration" window) 
> >intended to address the issue that you describe.
> 
> Dear Ross:  Sounds like a good idea to me.
> 
> However, what about returning a domain to the prior registrar 
> after an 
> accidental or improper transfer?
> 
> Regards,
> BobC, who apologizes if I am asking something I should already know;-{
> 
> 
> 
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> "A man convinced against his will,
>   Is of the same opinion still:-("
> 
> Dr. Bray attributed that statement to the Talmud.
> 
> I have never verified his attribution.   But it sure 
> describes President 
> Chirac.
> 
> "My mind is made up, don't confuse me with the facts:-("
> 
> "Reason?  Reason?  There's no darned reason, it's just Policy!"
> 
> 
>