RE: [registrars] Call for registrars to participate in an implementation analysis for TRANSFERS

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@verisign.com>]

Bob,

You are correct.  The dialog needs to be constructive and believe that it
will be.

Chuck

-----Original Message-----
From: Robert F. Connelly [mailto:rconnell@psi-japan.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 24, 2002 11:12 AM
To: Gomes, Chuck
Cc: Registrar Constituency; Duane Connelly; Mieko Umezu; Dan Busarow
Subject: RE: [registrars] Call for registrars to participate in an
implementation analysis for TRANSFERS


At 11:01 AM 12/24/02 -0500, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
>constructive dialog

Dear Chuck:  I appreciate your comment.  But the operative words are 
"constructive dialog".  I have seen that as a missing element of much that 
is going on in this debate.

Duane contacted Elana in Shanghai with a specific grievance and she passed 
him off with the statement that they have their rules and there can be no 
exceptions.

The problem was that their system was to send a complex message in English 
which the registrant could not understand.

One of the elements of the proposed settlement is that the lack of a reply 
should not justify a nack.

Regards, BobC


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Things are *so* organized in our town!
    How organized are they?
They are so organized that --
         even the boulevard stop signs are synchronized;-}