RE: [registrars] Shanghai Agenda

[Nikolaj Nyholm <nikolajn@ascio.com>]

Even though I won't be participating in Shanghai, I would also like to see
Schlund's bylaw proposal discussed.

http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/registrars/Arc01/msg03279.html

It was discussed (and, as I recall) supported, in Amsterdam.


Regards,
Nikolaj

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Beckwith, Bruce [mailto:bbeckwith@verisign.com] 
> Sent: 23. oktober 2002 00:00
> To: registrars@dnso.org
> Subject: RE: [registrars] Shanghai Agenda
> Importance: High
> 
> 
> Mike,
> 
> Would you also please consider devoting some time during the Registrar
> Constituency meeting to the following two topics, which were 
> discussed some
> at the FTC meeting, as well as touched on during the 
> Amsterdam meeting:
> 
> - Bulk WhoIs Requirement
> - Port 43 Access
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Bruce
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael D. Palage [mailto:michael@palage.com]
> Sent: Friday, October 18, 2002 9:29 AM
> To: registrars@dnso.org
> Subject: [registrars] Shanghai Agenda
> 
> 
> Hello All:
> 
> I should have the agenda for Shanghai's meeting finalized by 
> Monday after
> the next Registrar Constituency Executive Call. Current topics on the
> agenda: ICANN reform; update on transfers and Whois Task 
> Forces; initiation
> of deletes task force; .org transition; and whois update 
> (CRISP/Universal
> Whois). An additional topic that I believe is worth wild to 
> add in new TLDs.
> Bret Fausett has recently published an article on principle' 
> concerning the
> new TLD process, see 
> http://www.lextext.com/newTLDdiscussionpaper.h> tml. I
> believe 
> that it is a document that many should read 
> as I believe it is worth
> the constituency backing it. If there are any other topic 
> anyone would like
> added to the agenda, please let me know.
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Michael D. Palage
>