ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[registrars]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [registrars] And the future registry operator for .ORG is ????



Nikolaj,

I think you left out IMS/ISC both have been around for a long time, are
not affiliated with registries and want to do onw unique thing --
opensource the whole thing, also IMS/ISC are also entirely not for profit
and not associated with any for profit -- unlike all the other bidders.

-rick


On Wed, 19 Jun 2002, Nikolaj Nyholm wrote:

> a couple of quick notes from my review this morning...
>
> /n
>
> -----------------------------------------------------
> Interesting group of companies -- the only three with backing in the civic
> society seem to be ISOC/Afilias, GNR/Red Cross and UIA/Verisign.
>
> The rest seem like organisations made up for the purpose of the bid.
>
> Register.com has two applications -- The DotOrg Foundation and Register
> ORGanization, Inc..
> They've registered dotorgfoundation.org in the name of Seth Jacoby, a
> register.com employee, and registerorganization.org in the name of a
> RegistryPro employee.
>
> theorgfoundation.org has been registered in the name of one of eNom's
> employees.
>
> unityregistry.org is listed with Poptel as registrant.
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Ross Wm. Rader [mailto:ross@tucows.com]
> > Sent: 19. juni 2002 12:45
> > To: Michael D. Palage; registrars@dnso.org
> > Cc: discuss-list@opensrs.org
> > Subject: Re: [registrars] And the future registry operator
> > for .ORG is ????
> >
> >
> > Couple of things - I thought it was "nice" that the
> > Register.com bid page
> > forced a Gator installation down my throat (ick). Second, It was my
> > impression that part of this exercise was to move dotORG out
> > of VGRS - but,
> > they are behind two of the bids. Is this a PR exercise or?
> > Lastly, isn't
> > Registry Advantage the same thing as Register.com/Registry Pro?
> >
> > Keeping track of the players is becoming increasingly difficult ;)
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > -rwr
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Michael D. Palage" <michael@palage.com>
> > To: <registrars@dnso.org>
> > Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2002 2:18 AM
> > Subject: [registrars] And the future registry operator for
> > .ORG is ????
> >
> >
> > > http://www.icann.org/tlds/org/applications-received-18jun02.htm
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>