RE: [registrars] And the future registry operator for .ORG is ????

[Nikolaj Nyholm <nikolajn@ascio.com>]

a couple of quick notes from my review this morning...

/n

-----------------------------------------------------
Interesting group of companies -- the only three with backing in the civic
society seem to be ISOC/Afilias, GNR/Red Cross and UIA/Verisign.

The rest seem like organisations made up for the purpose of the bid.

Register.com has two applications -- The DotOrg Foundation and Register
ORGanization, Inc.. 
They've registered dotorgfoundation.org in the name of Seth Jacoby, a
register.com employee, and registerorganization.org in the name of a
RegistryPro employee.

theorgfoundation.org has been registered in the name of one of eNom's
employees.

unityregistry.org is listed with Poptel as registrant.
-----------------------------------------------------


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ross Wm. Rader [mailto:ross@tucows.com] 
> Sent: 19. juni 2002 12:45
> To: Michael D. Palage; registrars@dnso.org
> Cc: discuss-list@opensrs.org
> Subject: Re: [registrars] And the future registry operator 
> for .ORG is ????
> 
> 
> Couple of things - I thought it was "nice" that the 
> Register.com bid page
> forced a Gator installation down my throat (ick). Second, It was my
> impression that part of this exercise was to move dotORG out 
> of VGRS - but,
> they are behind two of the bids. Is this a PR exercise or? 
> Lastly, isn't
> Registry Advantage the same thing as Register.com/Registry Pro?
> 
> Keeping track of the players is becoming increasingly difficult ;)
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> -rwr
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Michael D. Palage" <michael@palage.com>
> To: <registrars@dnso.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2002 2:18 AM
> Subject: [registrars] And the future registry operator for 
> .ORG is ????
> 
> 
> > http://www.icann.org/tlds/org/applications-received-18jun02.htm
> >
> >
> >
>