ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[registrars]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [registrars] And the future registry operator for .ORG is ????


Neustar is listed..!?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ross Wm. Rader [mailto:ross@tucows.com] 
> Sent: 19. juni 2002 13:19
> To: Nikolaj Nyholm; registrars@dnso.org
> Subject: Re: [registrars] And the future registry operator 
> for .ORG is ????
> 
> 
> I also found it interesting that the only applicant, besides 
> VGRS, with any
> notable track record was Afilias - Neulevel is no where to be 
> found. Are
> they hiding behind one of the bids as VGRS is or...?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> -rwr
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Nikolaj Nyholm" <nikolajn@ascio.com>
> To: <registrars@dnso.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2002 7:03 AM
> Subject: RE: [registrars] And the future registry operator 
> for .ORG is ????
> 
> 
> > a couple of quick notes from my review this morning...
> >
> > /n
> >
> > -----------------------------------------------------
> > Interesting group of companies -- the only three with 
> backing in the civic
> > society seem to be ISOC/Afilias, GNR/Red Cross and UIA/Verisign.
> >
> > The rest seem like organisations made up for the purpose of the bid.
> >
> > Register.com has two applications -- The DotOrg Foundation 
> and Register
> > ORGanization, Inc..
> > They've registered dotorgfoundation.org in the name of Seth 
> Jacoby, a
> > register.com employee, and registerorganization.org in the name of a
> > RegistryPro employee.
> >
> > theorgfoundation.org has been registered in the name of one 
> of eNom's
> > employees.
> >
> > unityregistry.org is listed with Poptel as registrant.
> > -----------------------------------------------------
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Ross Wm. Rader [mailto:ross@tucows.com]
> > > Sent: 19. juni 2002 12:45
> > > To: Michael D. Palage; registrars@dnso.org
> > > Cc: discuss-list@opensrs.org
> > > Subject: Re: [registrars] And the future registry operator
> > > for .ORG is ????
> > >
> > >
> > > Couple of things - I thought it was "nice" that the
> > > Register.com bid page
> > > forced a Gator installation down my throat (ick). Second, 
> It was my
> > > impression that part of this exercise was to move dotORG out
> > > of VGRS - but,
> > > they are behind two of the bids. Is this a PR exercise or?
> > > Lastly, isn't
> > > Registry Advantage the same thing as Register.com/Registry Pro?
> > >
> > > Keeping track of the players is becoming increasingly difficult ;)
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > -rwr
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Michael D. Palage" <michael@palage.com>
> > > To: <registrars@dnso.org>
> > > Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2002 2:18 AM
> > > Subject: [registrars] And the future registry operator for
> > > .ORG is ????
> > >
> > >
> > > > http://www.icann.org/tlds/org/applications-received-18jun02.htm
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> 


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>