ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[registrars]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [registrars] expiry date and creation date dont match


It would also make it difficult for registrants to repatriate hijacked
names..."sorry sir, you have to wait sixty days to get your name back..."

-rwr

----- Original Message -----
From: "Nezih Erkman" <nezih@erkman.com>
To: "Registrars Constituency" <registrars@dnso.org>
Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 3:04 PM
Subject: Re: [registrars] expiry date and creation date dont match


> I would like to see 60 days lock on registrar transfer. This would stop
> "registrar hoping" technique used by CC thieves.
>
> Nezih Jack Erkman
> R & K GBS, Inc.
> 000Domains.com
> Cell: 501-779-1934
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Rob Hall" <rob@momentous.ca>
> To: "Registrars Mail List" <registrars@dnso.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 12:45 PM
> Subject: RE: [registrars] expiry date and creation date dont match
>
>
> > I think there are cases where you would both want the 60 days and some
> cases
> > where you would not want it.
> >
> > Rather than a standard across registrars, I would prefer to have some
> > flexibility here.
> >
> > I agree with Tim that in most cases of a change of ownership it is
> agreeable
> > to keep it for a period of time.
> >
> > However, there are cases where the transfer of ownership was due to a
> > dispute, such as a UDRP result.  In cases like these, we would not want
to
> > have to lock the customer down for the 60 days.
> >
> > So my preference would be to not create a mandatory standard, but to
leave
> > it to the registrars discretion as to whether to implement one and in
what
> > cases.
> >
> > Rob.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-registrars@dnso.org [mailto:owner-registrars@dnso.org]On
> > Behalf Of Tim Ruiz
> > Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 11:32 AM
> > To: registrars@dnso.org
> > Subject: Re: [registrars] expiry date and creation date dont match
> >
> >
> > Patrick,
> >
> > Actually, I think the 60 day hold on transfers when a domain changes
> > ownership is a good idea. We are considering that ourselves. Especially
> > since our experience has been that not all registrars are as cooperative
> as
> > we try to be when something goes wrong. If the domain is still with us
> when
> > am issue arises over a change of ownership, we will be in a much better
> > position to correct any errors.
> >
> > Tim
> >
> >  -------- Original Message --------
> >    Subject: Re: [registrars] expiry date and creation date dont match
> >    From: Patrick <dnso-reg@gandi.net>
> >    Date: Wed, April 10, 2002 7:27 am
> >    To: "Registrars@Dnso. Org" <registrars@dnso.org>
> >
> >    On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 09:38:36PM +0530, Bhavin Turakhia took time
to
> >    write:
> >    > can anyone tell me when would something like this happen -
> >    >
> >    >    DOMAIN: kinminks.com
> >    >    Record last updated on 25-Mar-2002.
> >    >    Record expires on 04-Sep-2002.
> >    >    Record created on 25-Mar-2002.
> >    >
> >    > note that the record is created on 25-Mar-2002, but expires on
> >    > 4th-Sep-2002 - which is less than a year
> >    >
> >    > Additoinal info:
> >    >
> >    > * the domain is currently regstered with netsol
> >    >
> >    > * the domain was earlier with namezero
> >
> >    AFAIK this means the owner name was changed.
> >
> >    Netsol changes the creation date with an ownership change, and then
> >    refuses to transfer domain names (rule of 60 days). I already asked
> >    ICANN about this, and they seem to be OK with that.
> >
> >    But we had many customers with Namezero : they asked for a
> >    change of ownership (to be able later on to do the transfer),
> >    which was done late by Namezero/Netsol, thus the domain was near
> >    expired, and unable to be transfered to us.
> >
> >    Patrick Mevzek.
> >    Gandi.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>