DNSO Mailling lists archives


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [registrars] Important Issue Update Briefing - DELETES DEBATE LIST

Please note that this effort is more of a gathering of interesting
individuals (ie - list BOF) than an official task force. I'm not expecting
any earth-shattering conclusions to come out of this effort other than an
increased understanding of the various positions and proposals that are out
there. At the end of this, deletes remain a registry problem that must
ultimately be solved by the registry. Their request to provide them with
input is welcomed and should be taken advantage of by all - join the list,
join the discussion, make sure the registry hears you.


----- Original Message -----
From: "Rob Hall" <rob@momentous.ca>
To: "Michael D. Palage" <michael@palage.com>; <registrars@dnso.org>
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 5:22 PM
Subject: RE: [registrars] Important Issue Update Briefing - DELETES DEBATE

> Hello all,
> Just a point of clarification on Issue # 2.  As you all know, we had a
> meeting in Montevideo with the registries about the delete issues.  From
> that meeting, it was decided to start a group discussing the different
> options, and some papers have even been presented that are now under
> discussion.
> As I was chosen (somewhat be default) as the chair of that meeting (and
> the mailing list it seems), I guess it is my place to annouce here where
> those discussions are taking place.  I appologize for not having though to
> do so earlier.  It was my oversight that all registrars whom might be
> interested would not be at the meeting.
> There is a mailing list that was setup for this debate.  To get on it,
> an email
> to owner-icann-delete@total.confusion.net.  Register.com is hosting the
> mailing list for us.
> Out of the discussion with the registries, the group has asked for 4
> position papers from the different options presented.  They were due last
> Friday.  One has been received, and 2 others are expected immenently
> (delayed by events that overtook us all).  Discussion has already begun.
> I will be happy to report back on any progress, but we have had a very
> productive meeting, and are moving forward quickly.  I hope to have
> something to report in the next few weeks.
> If you have an interest, please feel free to join us.  Rick, I would
> that you also join the group as your input would be valuable in moving
> forward.
> Rob.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-registrars@dnso.org [mailto:owner-registrars@dnso.org]On
> Behalf Of Michael D. Palage
> Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 1:22 PM
> To: registrars@dnso.org
> Subject: [registrars] Important Issue Update Briefing
> Importance: High
> ISSUE 2: Delete issues continue to be a problem. Rick Wesson is the point
> person for the Registrar Constituency on this issue and has been
> with the various parties involved. Please forward any questions or
> to Rick.

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>