DNSO Archives: [registrars]

ICANN/DNSO DNSO Mailling lists archives

[registrars]

<<< Chronological Index >>> <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [registrars] DomainRegistry.com response to ICANN - Verisign

To: <ross@tucows.com>
Subject: RE: [registrars] DomainRegistry.com response to ICANN - Verisign
From: "Robert F. Connelly" <rconnell@psi-japan.com>
Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2001 08:00:15 +0900
Cc: "Larry Erlich" <erlich@domainregistry.com>, <registrars@dnso.org>
In-Reply-To: <NEBBKOFECLNIIFKJMMPDAEMLDGAA.ross@tucows.com>
References: <3AC88C1D.353C@domainregistry.com>
Sender: owner-registrars@dnso.org

At 09:52 AM 4/2/01 -0400, Ross Wm. Rader wrote:

>There are no ICANN policies concerning warehousing.

Dear Ross:  I think there are.  There is certainly one in the new proposal 
to Verisign.

Q:  Do you think there should *not* be a rule against warehousing?

Regards, BobC

Follow-Ups:
- RE: [registrars] DomainRegistry.com response to ICANN - Verisign
  - From: "Ross Wm. Rader" <ross@tucows.com>
- Re: [registrars] DomainRegistry.com response to ICANN - Verisign
  - From: Amadeu Abril i Abril <Amadeu@nominalia.com>

References:
- Re: [registrars] DomainRegistry.com response to ICANN - Verisign
  - From: Larry Erlich <erlich@domainregistry.com>
- RE: [registrars] DomainRegistry.com response to ICANN - Verisign
  - From: "Ross Wm. Rader" <ross@tucows.com>

<<< Chronological Index >>> <<< Thread Index >>>