Re: [registrars] Position Paper??

[Larry Erlich <erlich@domainregistry.com>]

Richard Lindsay wrote:

> The individual points Mike has identified are fine, with the
> exception of:
> 
> > • Registrars favor use of existing RRP protocol for shared registries.
> 
> since many proposals do not use the exact same protocol.  It may
> be reworded to say:
> 
> Registrars favor use of a Registry Registrar Protocol that will
> ensure fair access for all Registrars, and encourage that a
> protocol be submitted to the IETF such that an open source
> solution will be available to all registries.
> 
> Or something like that.  I think we can actually do without
> the point if there is any dissent.
> 

Richard, I prefer Mike's original statement. 
Not "a Registry Registrar Protocol" but
"existing Registry Registrar Protocol". 

Larry Erlich

http://www.DomainRegistry.com

-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Larry Erlich - DomainRegistry.com, Inc.
215-244-6700 - FAX:215-244-6605 - Reply: erlich@DomainRegistry.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------