RE: [registrars] Position Paper??

["Michael D. Palage" <mpalage@infonetworks.com>]

I have a list of those consensus items (see below) and can put them together
in a report rather quickly. I feel a report like this would be similar to
the ISPC and Business Constituency. I do not believe that we can objectively
create a report like the IPC ranking the proposals because of all of the
registrars participating in various proposal.

• Must be new TLDs.
• Must be generic TLDs in testbed.
• Must be chartered TLDs in testbed.
• All ICANN accredited registrars must be able to provide registration
services in any new TLDs.
• Registrars favor use of existing RRP protocol for shared registries.
• ICANN must develop criteria for evaluating registries during testbed
period.

Mike

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-registrars@dnso.org [mailto:owner-registrars@dnso.org]On
Behalf Of Paul M. Kane
Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2000 1:42 AM
To: Registrars List
Subject: [registrars] Position Paper??


Morning all,

I note the IPC, ISPC and Business Constituencies have all submitted
comments on the introduction of new TLDs.

Is the Registrar Constituency going to submit a position paper too?? I
recall we had rough consensus in Yokohama on a number of issues.........

See you in LA

Best

Paul