Re: [nc-whois] HOW TO PROCEED

[Thomas Roessler <roessler-mobile@does-not-exist.net>]

Sounds good.  (Note: This mail may take 24 hours to reach you guys.)

On 2003-03-17 10:22:57 -0500, Marilyn Cade wrote:
> From: "Cade,Marilyn S - LGCRP" <mcade@att.com>
> To: "NC-WHOIS (E-mail)" <nc-whois@dnso.org>
> Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2003 10:22:57 -0500
> Subject: [nc-whois] HOW TO PROCEED
> Envelope-to: roessler-mobile@does-not-exist.net
> Delivery-date: Mon, 17 Mar 2003 16:25:14 +0100
> X-No-Spam: whitelist
> 
> I spent some time this week end trying to sort out what we can actually say in addition to the Issues Report. 
> 
> My conclusion after reviewing inputs, and different perspectives of TF members is that we can't say a whole 
> lot more, other than gathering the materials contributed and noting that some members of the Task Force made
> specific contributions.
> 
> Here's the recommended approach.
> 
> Tony and I will redraft the Introduction to simply explain what this is, using Thomas' input and circulate it.
> Second section will be the Issues Report which was posted last week, without any change.
> the third section will capture the "Need for Further Consultation" from the Issues Report.
> The fourth section will [largely be what Thomas posted] but with an effort to fully reflect the broad and different views of the TF itself; it will include the list of contributions which have been received as documents, and a listing of the various viewpoints with an introductory statement which says that
> these were received by the Task Force as individual contributions from members and other parties, but
> that the Task Force did not develop any kind of agreement on the different perspectives. Like the initial survey results which should be included, they are presented 
> as concepts that may be useful in "next steps".
> 
> It will be as balanced and inclusive of all views as possible and make every attempt not to present advocacy of one perspective or another.
> 
> We'll review it tomorrow. IF we can't agree, then we will simply let the Issues Report stand as it is and make a short statement but without the document concluded by RIO.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 202-255-7348c
> mcade@att.com

-- 
Thomas Roessler				<roessler@does-not-exist.org>