RE: [nc-udrp] RE: Summary of Responses 82-89

[James Carmody <carmodyjim@yahoo.com>]

You are correct, Scott.  It took me about 3.5 hours to
go over that stuff. A lot of the verbal material was
lost because there was not enough space provided.  I
guess I could sum it all up by saying that my survey
people wanted "better decisions" (more in favor of
Respondents) rendered by 3 member panels paid little
or nothing with a robust opportunity to appeal.  We
did not ask a question about paying for this and I
received no suggestions.

Regards,
Jim
--- MSD@tzmm.com wrote:
> It seems a terrible waste of resources to have the
> designated
> representatives, who were chosen for their
> experience, to be reduced to the
> role of mere clerks in compiling statistics.  It
> also would be a terrible
> mistake to base changes in policy on a numerical
> count of responses.  It
> seems to me that the representatives, after
> reviewing all of the responses
> to make specific recommendations for changes. 
> Perhaps the representatives
> could be broken down into subcommittees to discuss
> and recommend on certain
> issues.  Otherwise, my secretary could just as
> easily performed my function.
> 
> Best regards.
> 
> M. Scott Donahey
> Tomlinson Zisko Morosoli & Maser LLP
> 200 Page Mill Rd.
> Palo Alto, CA  94306
> Phone:  (650) 325-8666
> Fax:      (650) 324-1808
> msd@tzmm.com
> www.tzmm.com
> 
> 		"This email message is for the sole use of the
> intended
> recipient(s) and may contain confidential and
> privileged information.  Any
> unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution
> is prohibited.  If you
> are not the intended recipient, please contact the
> sender by reply email and
> destroy all copies of the original message."
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: CCHICOINE@thompsoncoburn.com
> [mailto:CCHICOINE@thompsoncoburn.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 9:56 AM
> To: carmody@lawyer.com;
> CCHICOINE@thompsoncoburn.com; nc-udrp@dnso.org
> Subject: [nc-udrp] RE: Summary of Responses 82-89
> 
> 
> Oh, Jim you are not off the hook yet!!!!!  We still
> have to review the
> responses received from the ICANN website (which I
> have not yet received
> from ICANN) and then the Chairs will try to
> accumulate everyone's summaries
> and prepare a draft report, but we will want
> everyone's input on the draft
> before we final it and send it to NC.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: James Carmody [mailto:carmodyjim@yahoo.com]
> Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 5:13 PM
> To: cchicoine@thompsoncoburn.com; nc-udrp@dnso.org
> Subject: Summary of Responses 82-89
> 
> 
> Attached.  I have really enjoyed working with all of
> you and will enjoy reading the final report.
> 
> Best wishes from Houston,
> Jim Carmody
> 
> =====
> James A. Carmody, nn5o, carmody@lawyer.com
> Voice Mail: 713 446 4234; eFax: 815 461 5321
> 
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Sports - sign up for Fantasy Baseball
> http://sports.yahoo.com
> 


=====
James A. Carmody, nn5o, carmody@lawyer.com
Voice Mail: 713 446 4234; eFax: 815 461 5321

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Try FREE Yahoo! Mail - the world's greatest free email!
http://mail.yahoo.com/