ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[nc-str]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [nc-str] Comments to ALSC Draft V 3


At 22:19 16/01/02 +1300, DPF wrote:

>Hi Rita.
>
>
>An SO though is all the stakeholders in a particular area such as
>domain names, addresses or protocols.

It is why the ALSO should be considered as a body with important 
differences in relation to the others SOs.
There is no problem for me to call the At Large Members' organization as 
ALSO, but it should be clear that the ALSO is too different.


>And how would this be different from the current Names Council which
>is meant to do this?
>
>Personally I think that the Names Council has not been at all
>successful in doing this (mainly because not resourced properly) but
>again not sure how creating a differently titled Names Council would
>help.  Really I'm after details of different composition or procedures
>which would make a difference.

Agreed.

Raul





<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>