Re: [nc-org] implementation and TF process
On Tue, 25 Sep 2001, at 16:23 [=GMT-0400], Ken Stubbs wrote:
> > In order to protect against usurpation by the ICANN Staff, we
> > can perhaps add some general caveat that "contractual negotiations
> > with ICANN should not be used to impose additional policy
> > requirements on the applicant." (This would have to be worded
> > much more carefully, of course).
> this concept needs to be clearly elaborated... "not for profit" is a very
> broad 'concept"...
> there has to be a clearly defined business plan proposed and "experienced
> professional mgt " with
> a strong business background.
So only something like Afilias minus NetSol can succesfully apply to
be the new operator? If this is the case, we are wasting our time