RE: [nc-intake] Drfat report for NC meeting 17 August

[Elisabeth Porteneuve <Elisabeth.Porteneuve@cetp.ipsl.fr>]

Roberto et al.,

There is not yet a mailing list with the "Voting Registry"
members, but it will be created when necessary upon request.
Today we have 202 members on that list, I believe some
persons registered here in parallel to the At Large Membership,
-- I noted an increased traffic in the end of July and do not
see any other explanation/correlation.

I noted also that each time there is a nomination to the ICANN Board
position, a group of supporters apply to the  "Voting Registry" 
-- some of them do it simultaneously and use the similar wrong template.
Do not tell me it is NOT correlated -- I know it is not. I explain to you
here how confusing it is for end users to distinguish in the ICANN/DNSO
jungle superposed sometimes to Constituency jungle.

Elisabeth (going astray from the main subject)
NB. I browsed very rapidly your comments, and wonder if some requests
    are compatible with technical possibilities. I need to re-read your
    proposal to comment more.
    Coming to Chuck (gTLD) proxy problem. I know that some constituencies
    elect or will elect 5 possible representatives for the Names Council,
    one per region, then delegate only 3 of them to the NC, the remaining
    two being Alternates for replacements. How do you see such a scheme ?
    You should also thing about extreme situation, pure maths, what happen
    if all 3 delegates are not available. Such as we have
    for the next NC with regard to NCDNH. Kathy resigned. Zacharia is on
    vacation. YJP as well. I believe that the system of Constituency
    Alternates have a lot of advantages to that, provided these
    Alternates are known in advance.


> From R.Gaetano@iaea.org Mon Aug  7 10:35 MET 2000
> From: R.Gaetano@iaea.org
> Message-ID: <14858C5D7DA4D111B0A90001FA371FD10383D782@sg-m1.iaea.or.at>
> To: philip.sheppard@aim.be, nc-intake@dnso.org,
>         Elisabeth.Porteneuve@cetp.ipsl.fr
> Subject: RE: [nc-intake] Drfat report for NC meeting 17 August
> Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2000 10:29:51 +0200 
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> 
> Ooops, I should stop answering a piece of mail before having read the whole
> mailbox. Sorry.
> 
> > I am happy to add the third category of GA - Is there a 
> > defining list for
> > this group also?
> 
> For the "Voting Registry" there's a Web page with lists (see
> http://www.dnso.org/secretariat/rosterindex.html), but I don't know if
> there's a mailing list.
> 
> Elisabeth, can you answer this one for me, please?
> 
> Regards
> Roberto
>