Re: [nc-impwhois] Starting point for WHOIS implementation discussions
On 2003-01-14 07:59:03 -0800, Rick Wesson wrote:
> I continue to believe that a registrant acknologement is all that
> would be required -- I don't understand how you come to the
> conclusion you did, please elaborate as the definitions provided
> are only to add clarity to the discussion.
> VERIFIED - The registrant has acknowledged that the information is
> true and correct.
> VALIDATED - VERIFIED by a 3rd party that the data is syntactically
> and semanticly ACCURATE.
> ACCURATE - Free from error, conforming to local, geographical and
> political postal addressing, international PSTN dialing
> and RFC2822 standards.
Is it possible that the this discussion is based on some confusion
around the notion of a "3rd party" in the definition of "VALIDATED"?
I.e., is this supposed to mean "party different from registrant" or
"different from registrar"?
Thomas Roessler <firstname.lastname@example.org>