RE: [nc-budget] RE-CIRCULATING PHILLIP'S DRAFT DNSO BUDGET FOR TODAY'S TELECON

["Cochetti, Roger" <rogerc@netsol.com>]

sorry for the confusion

-----Original Message-----
From: Erica Roberts [mailto:erica.roberts@bigpond.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2000 7:18 AM
To: Cochetti, Roger; nc-budget@dnso.org
Subject: Re: [nc-budget] RE-CIRCULATING PHILLIP'S DRAFT DNSO BUDGET FOR TODAY'S TELECON

I have been trying to get in to the conference call for 20 minutes but have been on hold (listening to music) since 800est.

Can you get in touch with the operator to connect me plse?!

 

erica

 

 

----- Original Message -----

From: Cochetti, Roger

To: 'nc-budget@dnso.org'

Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2000 11:46 AM

Subject: [nc-budget] RE-CIRCULATING PHILLIP'S DRAFT DNSO BUDGET FOR TODAY'S TELECON

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Philip Sheppard [mailto:philip.sheppard@aim.be]
Sent: Friday, November 03, 2000 11:37 AM
To: nc-budget@dnso.org
Subject: Re: [nc-budget] DNSO BUDGET

Roger and all on the Budget committee

thanks for reminding us of Ken's March budget. As I mentioned before I have been working on a more detailed and flexible first estimate based on input such as Ken's and other costs over the intervening months.

 

For discussion this is attached. The structure (black text) is perhaps the most important. It is based on the tasks identified by Chuck et al in the job description.  If we can agree to this then the actual figures (in blue) - ie salary etc and hours allocated can be changed as we think best. It is designed so that changing the bases cost automatically updates the costs per objective.

 

Hope this provides a useful start to this next step.

 

 

Philip.

 

(I will be out of the office until Nov 8).