ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[nc-budget]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [nc-budget] RE-CIRCULATING PHILLIP'S DRAFT DNSO BUDGET FOR TODAY'S TELECON


Thanks - have you guys moved off summertime or ???

erica
----- Original Message -----
From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@verisign.com>
To: "'Dany Vandromme'" <vandrome@renater.fr>; "Erica Roberts"
<erica.roberts@bigpond.com>
Cc: "Cochetti, Roger" <rogerc@netsol.com>; <nc-budget@dnso.org>
Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2000 12:30 PM
Subject: RE: [nc-budget] RE-CIRCULATING PHILLIP'S DRAFT DNSO BUDGET FOR
TODAY'S TELECON


> Erica,
>
> It is about 7:30 a.m. here.  The call is scheduled for 8 a.m. EST.
>
> Chuck
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dany Vandromme [mailto:vandrome@renater.fr]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2000 7:27 AM
> To: Erica Roberts
> Cc: Cochetti, Roger; nc-budget@dnso.org
> Subject: Re: [nc-budget] RE-CIRCULATING PHILLIP'S DRAFT DNSO BUDGET FOR
> TODAY'S TELECON
>
>
> On Tue, 21 Nov 2000, Erica Roberts wrote:
>
> > I have been trying to get in to the conference call for 20 minutes but
> have been on hold (listening to music) since 800est.
> > Can you get in touch with the operator to connect me plse?!
> -
> For me the teleconf is 35 mn ahead
> -
> >
> > erica
> >
> >
> >   ----- Original Message -----
> >   From: Cochetti, Roger
> >   To: 'nc-budget@dnso.org'
> >   Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2000 11:46 AM
> >   Subject: [nc-budget] RE-CIRCULATING PHILLIP'S DRAFT DNSO BUDGET FOR
> TODAY'S TELECON
> >
> >
> >
> >   -----Original Message-----
> >   From: Philip Sheppard [mailto:philip.sheppard@aim.be]
> >   Sent: Friday, November 03, 2000 11:37 AM
> >   To: nc-budget@dnso.org
> >   Subject: Re: [nc-budget] DNSO BUDGET
> >
> >
> >   Roger and all on the Budget committee
> >   thanks for reminding us of Ken's March budget. As I mentioned before I
> have been working on a more detailed and flexible first estimate based on
> input such as Ken's and other costs over the intervening months.
> >
> >   For discussion this is attached. The structure (black text) is perhaps
> the most important. It is based on the tasks identified by Chuck et al in
> the job description.  If we can agree to this then the actual figures (in
> blue) - ie salary etc and hours allocated can be changed as we think best.
> It is designed so that changing the bases cost automatically updates the
> costs per objective.
> >
> >   Hope this provides a useful start to this next step.
> >
> >
> >   Philip.
> >
> >   (I will be out of the office until Nov 8).
> >
> >
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> Dany VANDROMME                    |  Directeur du GIP RENATER
>
>                 Reseau National de Telecommunications
>          pour la Technologie, l'Enseignement et la Recherche
>
>                                   |  ENSAM
> Tel   :  +33 (0)1 53 94 20 30     |  151 Boulevard de l'Hopital
> Fax   :  +33 (0)1 53 94 20 31     |  75013 Paris
> E-mail: Dany.Vandromme@renater.fr |  FRANCE
> --------------------------------------------------------------------



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>