[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ga] NC violations of ICANN charters
After checking further, I found an error in my statement:
On 9 August 1999, "Mark C. Langston" <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>I believe the term that Amadeu(?) very much wanted applied here was
>that the email@example.com list would be the "sole expression" of the GA.
>Why it was so important that that particular phrase be used, I still
>do not know.
The correct phrase here is, "regular expression".
>....and, if my memory of events is still somewhat accurate, the NC at
>first didn't want a mailing list to be representative of the GA. And
>once it was clear that it would be, they did not want the IFWP list to
>be that expression.
...further checking on this reveals at least Mr. Sola's motives for
not wanting the IFWP list to be the GA:
"...the managment of the IFWP cannot be trusted"
(from http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/discuss/Archives/msg00148.html )
Mark C. Langston Let your voice be heard:
Systems Admin http://www.icann.org
San Jose, CA http://www.dnso.org