[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ga] NC violations of ICANN charters
On 9 August 1999, Kent Crispin <email@example.com> wrote:
>You missed section 2e:
> (e) The NC shall forward to the Board, from among those persons
> nominated by the GA, its selection(s) for the Director(s) to fill
> any open Board position(s) reserved for the DNSO. Any such
> selection(s) must have the affirmative votes of at least one-half
> (1/2) of all the members of the NC.
You're right, I did miss that. At the very least this should be
located in, or referenced by, the section I quoted. What, if any,
is the procedure for submitting requests for bylaws amendments?
>It is the NC that selects the actual Directors, from the candidates
>nominated by the GA. It is true that the NC must specify a
>procedure whereby the GA can submit nominations. For example, the
>NC could send a message to the ga list saying "please submit your
>nominations. No more than one nomination per member.
>Note that the NC is not even required to vote on every nominee...
Hm. Good points, and I'm not too sure how comfortable I am with
any of them.
Mark C. Langston Let your voice be heard:
Systems Admin http://www.icann.org
San Jose, CA http://www.dnso.org