Re: Re: [ga] Re: [centr-ga] Re: [nc-deletes] FW: [council] Concerns Regarding Report of DeletesTask Force

[Eric Dierker <eric@hi-tek.com>]

My father was only a simple ex-assistant surgeon general and he could not 
figure it out either.
Sotiris is literally a genuis in this area - and only small conclusions.
five different US federal courts have concluded differently and each lower 
section like probate, divorce, bankruptcy and trademark have remarkably 
differing approaches.  GO FIGURE.

Best we just read the contracts and decide from there.
(by the way what does a Gyaecologist do ;-) is that a gynocoligist for 
guys)

Eric Dierker

> I am only a simple Obstetrician and Gyaecologist, but it appears to me
> that we actually don't know what a domain name is (legally).
> 
> Fascinating...
> 
> el
> -- 
> Dr. Eberhard W. Lisse  \   *    /        Managing Member, NA-NiC (cc) 
> <el@lisse.NA> el108    /       | NA-NiC is the the .NA ccTLD Registry
> Private Bag X5501       \     /           NA-NiC, Not Just Like That!
> Oshakati, Namibia       ;____/     Telephone: +264 81 124 6733 (cell)
> Please send DNS/NA-NiC related e-mail to dns-admin@na-nic.com.na only
> 
> 
> In message <1141.66.74.225.23.1050353428.squirrel@www.hi-tek.com>, Eric
> Dierker
>  writes:
>> What you have written here suggests that the registrar owns a domain
>> name as  something seperate from an IP address.  I find this illusive
>> if not down  right wrong.
>> However in the current state of rules, I cannot show otherwise.
>> As a consultant advisor to a contractor registrar I still cannot tell
>> with  certainty what property rights are owned in a domain name
>> regitration. Litigation is like art, it reflects life it does not
>> control it. Even outstanding precedence can be altered by developments
>> and new customs  and dealings in trade and practices.  Pondits and
>> talking heads should be  wise to not set rules in their writings but
>> only reflect rules of order. e
>> 
>> > <John Berryhill wrote>
>> > The comments are worth considering for a few days, but certainly
>> > would have been more helpful if they were submitted during the
>> > comment period.
>> > 
>> > There is one error where the comments are seriously misguided,
>> > however, and that relates to expiration of a domain name during
>> > litigation.
>> > 
>> > To understand this central flaw in much of the comments, one must
>> > remember what a domain name is.
>> > 
>> > A domain name is the incident of a contract between the registrar
>> > and the registrant.  
>> 


--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html