Re: [ga] ITU Resolution 102 -- four years later
>Take another read of 102 and in each case where it says "private industry"
>or "private sector" insert "Local Telco Monopoly". Where it says
>"appropriate interests" or "appropriate entities" or similar insert "Local
>Telco Monopoly" or "Well-connected Telco Industry Player" and where it says
>"management" simply insert "regulation".
>Someone please tell me that I'm wrong - I really don't want to be "right" on
Sorry, but you're BANG ON.
The one thing we DO NOT want to replace ICANN with is the ITU. God help us.
Andrew P. Gardner
barcelona.com stolen, stmoritz.com stays. What's uniform about the UDRP?
We could ask ICANN to send WIPO a clue, but do they have any to spare?
Get active: http://www.tldlobby.com
This message was passed to you via the firstname.lastname@example.org list.
Send mail to email@example.com to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html