Re: [ga] Text of Letter to U.S. Commerce Dept. on ICANN Reform

[Marc Schneiders <marc@fuchsia.bijt.net>]

On Thu, 1 Aug 2002, at 18:06 [=GMT-0400], DannyYounger@cs.com wrote:

> http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A31870-2002Aug1.html

Marvelous quote, Lynn dismissing the joint protest of Verisign and the
European ccTLDs registries against the blueprint:

*"A registry by definition has a monopoly, so they all have a common
*interest in preserving individual monopolistic practices, so they
*don't want to be accountable to anybody."

Is by definition the registry of registries (to wit ICANN) exempt
from this interest in preserving monopolies? If so, why?

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html