Re: [ga] Re: ICANN & transfers

[Joop Teernstra <terastra@terabytz.co.nz>]

At 09:37 p.m. 30/07/2002 -0400, vinton g. cerf wrote:

>the information I have seems to show that these specifics are in the
>contract between registrars and registry at least for the particular
>case of .com/.net/.org so ICANN does not have 3rd party standing to
>intervene for that case. The newer gTLD contracts are a bit more
>refined.

The newer gTLD contracts do they include the ccTLD's that Verisign has 
bought? (.tv  .bz e.a.)
<snip>

>It looks so me as if we need something more refined than dis-
>accreditation as the principal tool providing incentive to adhere
>to contract terms.

fines?

And to whom will the cost of both the policing and the compliance be passed on?


--Joop

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html