Re: [ga] deletion policy - what should it look like?

["Genie Livingstone" <genie@magi.net>]

Hello All:

Yes  the definitions need to be clear and in place:

Registrar Accredition Agreement currently states in regards to Deletion
of SLD

J.
5. Registrar shall register SLDs to SLD holders only for fixed periods.
At the conclusion of the registration period, failure by or on behalf of
the SLD holder to pay a renewal fee within the time specified in a
second notice or reminder shall, in the absence of extenuating
circumstances, result in cancellation of the registration. In the event
that ICANN adopts a policy concerning procedures for handling expiration
of registrations, Registrar shall abide by that policy.


This can simply be amended to spedify time periods and actions.

. Registrar shall register SLDs to SLD holders only for fixed periods.
At the conclusion of the registration period ((___ defined by the
___time period prepaid by the SLD holder??___ and published in whois
record by the Registrar____))), failure by or on behalf of the SLD
holder to pay a renewal fee within the time specified in a second notice
or reminder shall ____ ((( but not exceeding 35 or 45 or 65 days past
the conclusion of the registration period___ ))), in the absence of
extenuating circumstances, result in cancellation of the registration
___((( no later than 45 or 65 or 85 days past the conclusion of
previously prepaid registration period and issuing Delete command to
Registry___))).

Cheers
Genie Livingstone





> perhaps we could begin by defining exactly what is meant by 'delete'?
>
> * delete from the registry?
> * delete from the registrar?
> * be unable to renew the domain anymore even tho something might still
> be temporarily 'live'?
>
>
>
> Thomas Roessler wrote:
> >
> > One of the things which have come out of the TF calls is that there
> > have been quite a few people calling for a uniform domain name
> > deletion policy (which I hereby baptise UDNDP).  What should this
> > policy look like?
> >
> > Options:
> >
> >  - Delete precisely N days after the date of expiry, at HH:00 UTC.
> >  - Delete between M and N days after date of expiry.  (N - M = 7)
> >  - others?
> >
> > Comments welcome.  While I don't believe that a deletion WG could
> > actually get a full consensus policy done until Bucharest (as Danny
> > suggested), producing a suggestion may still be worth the effort.
> >
> > --
> > Thomas Roessler
http://log.does-not-exist.org/
> > --
> > This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> > Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> > ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> > Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>
> --
> Dan Steinberg
>
> SYNTHESIS:Law & Technology
> 35, du Ravin phone: (613) 794-5356
> Chelsea, Quebec fax:   (819) 827-4398
> J9B 1N1                 e-mail:synthesis@videotron.ca
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>
>
>


--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html