Re: [ga] Re: [GA] ICANN conflict of interest policy and spousal employment

[Sotiris Sotiropoulos <sotiris@worldatlarge.org>]

jefsey wrote:

> hmmm, I suppose that t byfield made a lapsus calami and meant:
> "i'd like to suggest that the GA consider a resolution advocating a 
> change to ICANN's conflict-of-interest policy so that it does not 
> cover anymore spousal employment.".

Ha!  Some humour!!!  Nice to see someone can still approach such matters 
with a keen wit; it bolsters a healthy cynical approach to such 
distasteful goings-on.  My word!  tsk tsk.

> I second that proposition. 

I am howling with laughter jfc!!!

>
> I feel there is a consensus on the matter, at least by 2/3 of an 
> undisclosed part of the ICANN community, what matches the 
> non-transparency prerequisite.
> jfc 

This is a Jefsey classic for sure.

Sotiris Sotiropoulos
        Toronto, Canada       
        "Go Leafs go!"
        http://www.mapleleafs.com/playoffs02/news.php?ID=611


--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html