Re: [ga] Motion asking for GA poll on rebid of ICANN contract - update 1

["James Love" <james.love@cptech.org>]

----- Original Message -----
From: "William X Walsh" <william@wxsoft.info>
>
> This "motion" is nothing but an attempt by some vocal ICANN critics do
> try and create an "embarrassment" for ICANN so they can say that
> ICANN's own DNSO General Assembly has said "blah blah blah" and use
> that in their media plays.
>
> It is ill-times, counter productive, and those who support it are
> doing everything possible to try and rush it through.
>
> I hope our elected chair will be the leader he has shown himself to be
> and resist such efforts.
>

      William, the vote will not be an embarassmeent for the Lynn plan if
the voters reject the rebid.

  Why is an elected chair a leader if he doesn't allow votes?  What was he
elected to do?  Think for us?

--------------------------------
James Love mailto:james.love@cptech.org
http://www.cptech.org +1.202.387.8030 mobile +1.202.361.3040



--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html