Re: [ga] Motion asking for GA poll on rebid of ICANN contract
I must assume this is tongue in cheek, People who toot the horn of more process needed should already be involved in that process. You have sat on the sidelines and not contributed (by the way there are many alternatives out there but that is completely irrelevant as a request for bid creates such things for us to chose from) this is not a political game any more but serious business to get your people a vote in matters that count. What group in the ccTLDs do you represent? Do you really feel secure in the ICANN process? If you do have you signed a ccTLD, non service agreement with them? If so why? If not, Why Not? The timeline is perfectly reasonable because ICANN has set these matters in process. Any later timeline means that it is meaningless. (who you here for the forced timelines last year and the WG-Review timelines?) Someone just duped you or you are being sarcastic or something else, but this does not make sense given the scenario. Best Regards,
"Asaad Y. Alnajjar - Millennium Inc." wrote: I agree with Marilyn & disagree with the vote as presented to us, all this is obstruction of our ongoing work. If anyone is sincere enough, then first we should have a series of discussions and second the recommended ballot should have first included couple well thought alternatives, well thought implementation plan, management feasibility study, planned funding plan, action items, solutions, management structure & background qualification and so forth in order to justify why that any new body will be better than ICANN, more qualified or can be up to the global challenges. Further, the timeline posted is not reasonable at all and seems as bad as the vote ballot itself. Maybe many of you don't agree with ICANN policy or strategy, maybe we have grievances, some of us ccTLD managers have problems with ICANN's decisions, but no one on the GA so far have even offered a logical ICANN alternative or even suggested a qualified body to take on the task from ICANN without disturbing our DNS operations. It is always very easy to blame others and start red herrings to obstruct advancements, but it is very hard to recommend and deliver suitable alternatives.Best Regards, Asaad AlnajjarCEO Millennium Inc.Executive Director AINC (Arabic Internet Names Consortium)
|